Saturday, February 25, 2017

Second Bean Dish Question

Ahem.  All you Christians who voted for Donald Trump, I'm back with another question.

How's that lentil dish tasting?

It still isn't worth the loss of your birthright, you know.

That's all for now.

Peace be unto you.

Happiness Is A Choice, You Know

"Folks are usually about as happy as they make their minds up to be."

--Abraham Lincoln



There is an acronym that is common with the use of computers.  It is called "GIGO" and it means "garbage in, garbage out".  The implication is that if you program nonsense figures - garbage - into a computer, that's all you're going to get out of it.

It also applies to life in general.  If you go about the day expecting bad things to happen, they generally will.  You've allowed the garbage of negative feelings to turn your day into garbage.

In this day, when it seems like there's bad news everywhere, what we put into ourselves emotionally can have either profound - or tragic - effects.  Those of us who have the Lord Jesus Christ as our Lord and savior already have the greatest gift ever.  But you have control over how your journey goes and what you take in - and focus on - can affect you, for better or worse.

To give you an example, let's use President Donald Trump.  As you might already know, he wasn't my choice in the general election last fall, and I don't think that he's suitable to be president.

However, he is our president, and I have absolutely no control over that.

What I do have control over, though, is how happy I am.  My happiness isn't dependent on who's president, or whether some sports team I like is winning.  I've already got the greatest gift in the world from the Lord.  I'm also married to a loving, wonderful wife, and we have two loving children.

There is so much blessing in my life, how can I let something I have no control over dictate to me how happy I can be?  That's crazy talk.

You control how happy you are, and how you express yourself plays a big part in it.

Joel Osteen, senior pastor of Lakewood Church in Houston, Texas, wrote in The Power Of I Am that our own words can have an effect on us and our lives.  You can say "I am blessed and I am beautiful" or you can say, "I am cursed and I am ugly."  Thus, you should choose your words and thoughts carefully.

When I go to work, my mindset and beliefs lead me to expect a good day.  Admittedly, not every day is a good one.  But my thoughts and expectations make the difference between looking forward to the workday and dreading the next bad thing that's going to happen.

The late Colonel William "Bull" Simons, when faced with a flight in very heavy turbulence, took a nap.  He explained to one of the men flying with him that since there was nothing he could do about it, he might as well sleep.

That's the way to face difficulty.  After all, there's a saying common to some Christians that goes like this: "Let go, and let God."  In other words, let God handle the stuff that is beyond us.

A caution to those who believe that they need more money to be happy.  If you're not happy before you get money, you probably won't be after you get more.

Money does not make a person happy, not matter what the wealth seekers claim.  If I get wealthy, great.  If I don't, then I'll still be happy.

Besides, loving money is dangerous.  Remember that the Apostle Paul wrote that the love of money is the root of all evil.

Wealth is a lot more than just money, anyway.  Many of us here in the United States are so blessed, especially when compared to people in the developing nations of the world.

What is really sad to me is seeing Christians who constantly talk negatively or are constantly unhappy.  Happiness is a choice, and they choose to be unhappy - even with the knowledge of their salvation.

I'm never entirely certain why people choose to be unhappy.  Do they feel let down by life, or left behind by others and their successes?  Or is it a shielding mechanism designed to keep people away from them?  I never really know, though I'm inclined to think that they don't know any other way to act.

Dealing with hateful Christians is bad enough, and I've written about them before, but constantly unhappy Christians are just plain sad.

That's all for now.

Peace be unto you.

Sunday, February 19, 2017

No Hatred For Me, Please

"Hatred stirreth up strifes: but love covereth all sins."

                        Proverbs 10:12 (KJV)

If there's one thing I desire more and more lately, it's for all the hating to just stop.  It seems like that there's hatred all over the place.

Hatred has many facets, and here are just a few:

--Racial hatred

--Regional hatred

--National hatred

--Religious hatred

--Gender hatred

--Political hatred

--Class hatred

--Sexual Orientation hatred

Allow me to repeat one of my mantras here:  Hatred is a luxury you cannot afford.  Not only do you murder another person's spirit, you can murder your own spirit.  If you are a believer in Christ, hatred itself is enough to separate you from God.

It's just not worth it.

A lot of people are drawn into hatred by other people through unbelievably simple means.  All the "hate leaders" (my words) have to know are your problems and difficulties.  They then point at a target group and blame "them".  Nazi Germany used the technique as a part of their their persecution of the Jews.  As history shows, it was extremely effective.

The technique is still used to this day. Witness the recent attacks on Muslim immigrants, painting them all with the terrorist paintbrush, or the attacks on Mexicans coming to the United States, labeling them as drug dealers and rapists.

A "hate leader", by himself or herself, is not enough to start a hate build-up.  You have to have people willing to submit to the hatred.

It's rather easy, it's sad to say.  All you have to do is hate like the "hate leader" hates.

At one time, I listened to talk radio, though I didn't agree with a lot of what the hosts said.  It was interesting to hear their points of view to find not only points of commonality,  but also points of difference.

I had to stop listening, however.  I not only found that I was being lied to, more often than not, but one host in particular spouted off so much hatred that it was starting to contaminate me.

I will not name that particular host, but I'm not surprised that Great Britain banned him from entering their country.  The power of his hatred was apparent to others besides me, it seems.

There are few powerful tools that can help you better than research.  Take whatever you are told by a speaker or a TV/radio host with a grain of salt.  Critical examination of unquestioned beliefs, arguments, or philosophies is also vital.

That includes preachers, by the way.

Before you accuse me of liberal claptrap, allow me me to tell you something from my youth.  As I have mentioned before, I grew up in a Fundamentalist Christian church. On occasion, our pastor would start his sermon by asking how many of us had brought our Bibles to church with us.

When too of us few did so, he would go into a rant on why we needed to have our Bibles with us, and why we needed to follow along as he preached and read from the Bible.

You see, the Jonestown massacre in Guyana had happened not too long before, and our pastor recognized the power and potential danger a charismatic preacher held.

In 1978, more than 900 people, most of them U.S. citizens, were killed in a mass murder/suicide at Jonestown.  The leader, Jim Jones, preached a combination of Christianity and Marxism, along with a hefty dose of anti-U.S. Government paranoia.

Our pastor believed that if a charismatic preacher such as Jones could lead almost a thousand people (a third of them children) to their deaths, then so could others.  He stated that it was the responsibility of church members/believers to make certain that the pastor preached from the word of God - no matter what church we were in.

Given the events of recent years, I've come to realize that my pastor's fears were well-founded.

Don't give in to hatred.  Once you hit that particular pothole, it's so easy for you and your witness to fall apart.  Hatred not only separates you from other people, it separates you from God.


"...and if there be any other commandment, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, namely, THOU SHALT LOVE THY NEIGHBOR AS THYSELF.
"Love worketh no ill to his neighbour; therefore love is the fulfilling of the law."

                     Romans 13:9 (last part) and 10


That's it for now.

Peace be unto you.

Saturday, February 4, 2017

Response To A Question From A Friend

In my previous post, I wrote about Nazi Reichmarshal Herman Goering and his quote about how easy it was to get the populace behind a war.  A friend asked me if I admired Goering since it was a somewhat extensive quote.

No.

Herman Goering was a sad excuse for a human being.  He helped the Nazis rise to power, helped to rob and persecute the Jews of Europe, enriched himself at the expense of many people - Jewish or not - and used his Luftwaffe to bomb his neighboring countries.

He used his power to destroy political opponents and to frame generals who challenged his power.  He lived like a king while the German people suffered the deprivations of wartime shortages.

His quote, however, was rather chilling, in just how accurate it really is.  After learning the power of advertisers and how governments use their secrets to influence people, it's even more chilling.

Some of the quotes I'll write about are from people I admire.  Some, however, I don't admire.  That doesn't mean that what they said isn't important.

That's all for now.

Peace be unto you.

Tuesday, January 31, 2017

The Quotes, Part One

I happen to be a big fan of quotes, because a good quote can perfectly express a belief, or an ideal that appeals to you.  Sometimes, a quote can reveal very telling details about a person's motives or views.

Sometimes, the quote can reveal more than the person would want revealed.

Let me give you an example.  In 1946, during the Nuremberg War Crimes trials, Nazi Germany's Reichmarshal Herman Goering had this to say:

"Why, of course the people don't want war.  Why would some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life when the best that he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece?  Naturally, the common people don't want war; neither in Russia, nor in England, nor in America, nor for that matter in Germany.  But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy or a fascist dictatorship or a Parliament or a Communist dictatorship."

Gustave Gilbert, German-speaking intelligence officer interviewing Goering:  "There is one difference.  In a democracy, the people have some say in the matter through their elected representatives, and in the United States only Congress can declare wars."

Goering:  "Oh, that is all well and good, but, voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders.  That is easy.  All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger.  It works the same way in any country."

I thought about Goering's quote a lot during President George W. Bush's foray into destroying and punishing Iraqi strongman Saddam Hussein.  Rather apt, when you consider all those wasted lives - mostly Iraqi and U.S. lives.  President Bush's motives - bringing democracy to Iraq - was noble, but flawed.

I'm not just picking on Republican presidents here.  After all, the Vietnam War, with its 58,000 U.S. dead, really ramped up under Democratic President Lyndon Johnson.  Both Johnson and President Richard Nixon ended up in the unenviable position of wanting to end the war, but unwilling to appear the loser.

But lose it we did, because we failed to realize that while North Vietnam was Communist, their nationalism was even stronger.  Any country who invades and occupies Vietnam is in for a nasty lesson, as history has shown over the centuries.

Another lesson it provided was that a lot of conservative commentators really do not understand most Communist countries, nor do they understand the actual strength of nationalism.

That's all for now.

Peace be unto you.

Christians and Donald Trump

"As a Christian, how could you NOT vote for Donald Trump?"

That question was asked by a Christian friend to another friend, who is also a Christian.

That is a fascinating question, one that has replayed itself in my mind over the last few months.

It is also the wrong question.

The more accurate question is:

"As a Christian, how COULD you vote for Donald Trump?"

This question, I should point out, has really haunted me ever since the general elections in November.  How could Bible-believing Christians vote for a man such as Donald Trump?  When did narcissism, crude descriptions of consequence-free sexual assault, and rampant abuse and destruction of small businesses become the Christian ideal?

When a man's response to losing a verbal conflict with a woman is to make childish menstruation insults, why did a lot of Christians say, "OOOO, I've got to get me some of that!"

I can name a lot of faults here - and believe me, I will, either in this post, or others.  After all, encouraging apparent criminal activity and apparently committing treason in the same action is either a sign of creative thinking or simply run the mill sociopathic behavior.

He made fun of a handicapped person, which gives the people of our country - especially our children - a lousy example to follow.  Remember, the Bible tells us that we are a spectacle to the world - and the President of the United States is even more of a spectacle.

Then there's his congenital lying.  This alone should actually be a deal-breaker for Christians, but I have learned, to my dismay, that a lot of Christians could accurately be called LILACS.  Why?  Because they lie like anything.  Not only that, but IOIYAR is a functioning fact of life nowadays.

What is IOIYAR?  Literally, it means "It's O.K.if you're a Republican."  That belief came into hard play during President Bill Clinton's infidelity issues (and were they ever prominent.)  The general Republican reaction was disgust, moral reprehension and a desire to throw him under the earth.

You could've heard crickets chirp when a bunch of Republican congress-critter philanderers were outed all of a sudden.  The reactions of Republican supporters (and Christian supporters, too) ranged from continued moral indignation at President Clinton to anger at how the Republican philanderers had their privacy invaded.  After all, that was their business, not ours.

Now, there are a lot of Christian leaders who strongly recommended Donald Trump to be our president despite his strongly un-Christian actions and behavior.  After all, Dr. Jim Garlow said that Mr. Trump was surrounded by Christians and that Hillary Rodham Clinton had some sort of leftist socialist platform.  So obviously, Trump was the choice that Christians should and must vote into office.

For now, I will ignore Mr. Garlow's political ignorance and his willingness to be a false witness against Mrs. Clinton.  I say "mister" instead of doctor because thanks to his actions during the campaign, he is guilty of conduct unbecoming of a doctor of divinity.

There are two arguments against Garlow's reasons: One Christian reason and one historical reason.

The implication that being surrounded by Christians and Christian advisors and leaders in effect makes you a Christian leader is not only weird, but unbiblical as well.  I grew up in a Fundamentalist Christian church and our pastor mentioned many times that you cannot get other people into Heaven, nor can other people get you into Heaven.

"I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me."
                              John 14:6 (KJV)

I would love to see Donald Trump come to Christ, but his actions and narcissism make that a difficult hope.

Another implication from Garlow's comment is that by being surrounded by Christians means that Donald Trump can somehow be controlled.  Donald Trump is comparable to a force of nature, and not controlled by others.

I am hoping and praying that this is the ONLY comparison that can be made with Adolf Hitler, but the Nazi leader was also like a force of nature, and totally uncontrollable.  In 1933, Franz von Papen helped engineer Hitler's appointment to Chancellor of Germany on the belief that he could be controlled.

Von Papen was wrong, of course, as history shows.  Hitler used von Papen as if he were a tissue and quickly shunted him aside.

Other examples of this exist throughout history, but Hitler's is the most prominent and had the most effects on the rest of the world.

To be honest, the belief that "we can control him" is almost always a conceit and a bit of hubris on the part of the followers.  Besides, Donald Trump has more than enough hubris for everyone.

Also, the belief that he can be controlled is a trope commonly used in movies.  Are the Christians who voted for him (including Garlow) really that genre dumb?  This train wreck was in the making and it was so obvious to anyone who paid the slightest bit of attention.

Being a Christian doesn't mean that you don't have to make a decision, and it doesn't mean that you don't have to actually research and learn on your own.

It doesn't mean you have to be willingly dumb.

Letting someone else make your decision for you doesn't mean that you are a faithful Christian.  It makes you a tool, and a pretty useless one at that.  It also makes you a useless Christian as well.

Don't be a "sheeple".  After all, you have to answer for what you do.  Jim Garlow isn't going to answer for you, even if he led you to that decision.  He will answer for himself.

Being a sheeple makes you little more than a slave, and about as useless.

That's all for now.

Peace be unto you.

Monday, January 23, 2017

First Bean Dish Question

All you Right-Wing Conservative Christians who voted for Donald Trump, I have a question for you.

How does your lentil stew taste?  Still taste good?

Just asking.

I'll check back later.

Peace be unto you.